May 15, 2009
Bauder Working Up a Sweatt
Dr. Kevin Bauder speaks up and how refreshing it is. Here he addresses the FBFI directly:
As I said, my first purpose was to address younger fundamentalists. My second purpose is to address my generation of fundamentalist leaders, and especially the leadership of the Fundamentalist Baptist Fellowship International.
Gentlemen, we did not create this problem. I am absolutely certain that the leadership of the FBFI did not invite Pastor Sweatt to deliver a rant against Calvinism. I can only imagine how they must have cringed as they heard Pastor Sweatt’s address unfolding.
We did not create the problem, but it is up to us to solve it. It happened on our watch. If we do not say something to make this right, then the damage becomes our fault and the opprobrium becomes ours to bear. We shall have no one to blame but ourselves when we see a mass exodus of younger men from fundamentalism.
I am thankful that there is room within fundamentalism to overlook mistakes and to forgive sins. I am grateful for other fundamentalist leaders who have been charitable and kind with me when I have done stupid things (and I have!), and who have extended genuine forgiveness when I have sinned (and I have!). Having been the recipient of grace from the Lord and His people, I do not wish to see Pastor Sweatt dismissed abruptly and abusively.
Nevertheless, Pastor Sweatt has placed us in a very difficult situation. In a public venue, as a spokesman for fundamentalism, Pastor Sweatt has impugned the doctrinal integrity of his brethren. He has made charges without evidence and uttered recriminations that are simply false. Those of us who are leaders within fundamentalism have a stewardship, and we cannot afford simply to sweep this scandal under the rug.
The need to confront the problem is all the more acute if any of us regard Pastor Sweatt as a friend. Younger fundamentalists want to know whether we fear God or men. We cannot say that we believe in rebuking and separating from erring brethren, which we clearly practice to our Left, and then ignore public error when it occurs among our friends. If we are that inconsistent, then young leaders are right to dismiss us as hypocrites.
The leadership of the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship International has been presented with a problem, but that problem is also an opportunity. The fellowship meets in June. This meeting provides an occasion to display the strength of our character, the very thing that will establish our credibility with young leaders. They want to know how we will respond to Pastor Sweatt’s tirade. They want to know whether the FBFI is dominated by his vision of fundamentalism, or whether it is staking out a position that is more doctrinally and practically balanced. Frankly, I would like to know myself.
Within the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship International I have no power at all. The only thing that I can do is to appeal to the members of the board, whom I believe to be men of integrity and good will. Pastor Sweatt has handed you an opportunity to show what you really believe. If you wish to model the kind of fundamentalism that really is worth saving, then the time has come.
Posted by Bob Bixby at May 15, 2009 04:08 PM | eMail this entry! | 544 WordsThis entry was posted in the following categories: Fundamentalism
This is remarkable. I’ve never seen anything like it. Kevin is a scheduled speaker at the annual FBFI conference at Bethel Baptist in Schaumburg, IL next month. The conference also includes a general session Q & A symposium titled, “Let’s Discuss Conservative Evangelicalism.” Kevin laid the groundwork for his challenge to the FBFI in his 2005 address of a few years ago, “A Fundamentalism Worth Saving.” Now, more than ever, we need substantive answers to critical questions. This is not about young fundamentalists anymore. The old fundamentalists want to know too. I’ll be at the FBFI this June and I too will be looking for answers.
Posted by: Chuck Hervas at May 15, 2009 05:17 PMContrary to the address given by Pastor Sweatt last month, all my Calvinistic friends bleed evangelism. They simply believe it takes a miracle of God to raise dead sinners by giving them the Word of God. It takes deep prayer since it is God who must save them. My soteriological persuasions push me to a deeper walk with Christ and a more careful presentation of the Gospel. Usually our evangelistic teams at our church carefully go through Romans 3 verse by verse with the sinner. What a delight to see God open the eyes of a dead sinner’s understanding. I see Christ raise dead people all the time. Many of them are in our assembly!
BTW, Pastor Bixby, we are looking forward to having you at our Bible Conference/Evangelistic Outreach next month.
I do have some thoughts about what Dr. Bauder said. I expressed them over at SharperIron, so I’ll just copy my comments here.
—————————————-
I thank God for Dr. Bauder. He has extended his invitation to those who hold tenaciously to inerrancy and evangelism precisely because of a “sovereign grace” understanding of Scripture. Dr. Bauder has also raised the bar for all pastors and teachers to present arguments honestly and respectfully (1 Peter 3:15). Only good can come of this.
May we all also extend graciousness to Pastor Sweatt, who I have deeply respected for quite some time. He is a man of God, but even good and godly men overstate their case from time to time. It is a difficult situation since he spoke in the most public of forums. I pray that he corrects what he has said (as I have many times before as a pastor from my pulpit). Our churches will be greatly strengthened if a man of Pastor Sweatt’s reputation and stature would demonstrate humility. His error would be an opportunity for great credibility—to demonstrate what he has admitted his generation failed at.
Fundamentalism is nothing more than historic Christianity. Whatever you want to call it, the Lord will build and preserve His church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. Let us find common cause with all those who hold tenaciously to the Gospel. I have a friend in my town who pastors the Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church. If you visited you would find a fighting Fundamentalist with the depth of a Dr. Bauder. I have more in common with him than I do with the Hyles and SOTL churches who rarely preach expositionally, who think they are evangelizing, but are astonishingly careless with the souls of men. The Grace OPC church has been out door to door and doing weekly evangelism since 1969 when they were founded. By the way, their music is more majestic and conservative than many independent Baptist churches. I say all that to remember that we are not on earth to fight against our brethren, but against those who would deny the Gospel.
Thanks for all who would read this. I rarely post on these forums, but I was so delighted with Dr. Bauder’s answer with meekness and reverence that I had to publicly thank the Lord. The weapons of his warfare are not carnal. May God multiply that spirit in all of His pastors and teachers. That is the kind of historic fighting fundamental Christianity that we don’t have to save. You can’t kill it. It’s immortal.
Posted by: Matthew Black at May 15, 2009 06:22 PMI do think there are many problems among young fundamentalism, but Danny Sweatt was not the man to deal with them. Somebody does need to deal with them, however. That anything like his message occurred in an FBF meeting was almost shocking. Using Jack Hyles in a positive context in an FBF meeting is head-scratching. I haven’t been to an FBF meeting in well over 10 years. If there was one thing I didn’t miss, it was the preaching. Half of it was terrible. Not much different, however, than what I got in most chapel sermons in college.
If I was going to go after so-called conservative evangelicalism, it is this: worldliness, lack of holiness, and not practicing scriptural separation. I think they are dead wrong on their approach to cultural issues. I’ve read Wells’ books and what he does say is good, but he’s so ambiguous about what and who exactly he’s talking about. I would guess that it has resulted in almost zero changes. Wells is a hot interview and quote machine, but actually figuring out what he says to follow it—-I don’t see it.
And when I say separation, I’m even talking about the issue of the gospel. Conservative evangelicals don’t even separate over that. I don’t hear any talk of separation from them. I’d welcome anything that they have written on separation. Please link me to something that has been written on that. And that is a noble, big subject, by the way. Look through the Bible about what God called people out of. It’s in every other chapter.
Because of some of the above problems, I don’t find the conservative evangelicals credible either.
And I do think Calvinism is becoming too big a deal. Preach the Bible, but alright already with Calvin. If he were alive, he’d throw us in jail anyway. Luther might drown us.
Posted by: Kent Brandenburg at May 16, 2009 12:54 AMHi Pastor Kent.
Here is a book by CE R Kent Hughes that I have found to be extremely helpful on the topic of separation.
http://www.amazon.com/Set-Apart-Calling-Worldly-Church/dp/1581344910
Bob
Posted by: Bob Roberts at May 16, 2009 09:54 AMHi Bob. Thanks for the link. I’ll look into it. What about ecclesiastical separation? I should have differentiated.
Posted by: Kent Brandenburg at May 16, 2009 11:07 AMI was at the Gospel Coalition Conference this year which was specifically directed at young men—in particular, those who are in the ministry. Various speakers exposited the entire book of 2 Timothy. I think the contrast between Piper’s message at the GC conference and Sweatt’s at the FBFI conference basically says it all as to why young men are choosing to follow men like Piper versus men like Sweatt.
Listen to Piper’s message here.
Posted by: Shannon at May 16, 2009 01:27 PMKent said:
Preach the Bible, but alright already with Calvin. If he were alive, he’d throw us in jail anyway. Luther might drown us.
Thanks for the laugh! It’s true though!
(And I say that as a Calvinist that sends my daughter to a Lutheran school!)
Kent, I always enjoy your presence on my blog even though most of the time we don’t agree. I love arguing with you and I appreciate your dogged commitment to your convictions! It’s a moments like these when someone on your “side” of the argument drops the ball that you show your independent thinking by not rallying behind such a sorry message. May more of your tribe increase… (I just hope they become more Calvinistic though!)
Posted by: bob bixby at May 16, 2009 02:03 PMBob,
You don’t have to share a region with Kent. Please don’t encourage the guy!
Straight Ahead!
jt
Posted by: Joel Tetreau at May 16, 2009 09:00 PMKent,
The last line was a joke….hope you knew that.
Straight Ahead!
jt
Posted by: Joel Tetreau at May 16, 2009 09:02 PMBob,
I would hate to think of myself on the side of what I heard, but I understand what you mean, coming from your perspective. I might be less him than you are as it relates to the gospel and methods. And I don’t say that to disparage you. But thanks. You’re saying a good thing about independence. I do think that you really do believe what you say and you want to be consistent with it. If we’re going to persuade anyone, it will be by means of scripture, and only by that will God be glorified.
JT,
I’m sorry, but I can’t share a region with you.
Posted by: Kent Brandenburg at May 17, 2009 07:25 PMokay, let’s all break into Kum Ba Yah . . .
But I do want to say that while I disagree with a great many positions held by Pastor Brandenburg, I appreciate his commitment to the idea of the autonomous local church and Scripture as the only rule for faith and practice. It is somewhat refreshing that Bob is percieved to be on the far left of IFB-dom and Kent is percieved to be on the far right of IFB-dom, yet they don’t really care to push their views on one another’s church. I think this is what Paul meant when he rejoiced that “Christ is proclaimed”.
Posted by: Coach C at May 18, 2009 04:02 PM