April 22, 2008
Polygamy Kids
Does any of my readers know or have an opinion about what the state of Texas is doing with the Polygamy Kids? I see that a judge has okayed the children being placed in foster homes. There is something that seems awfully heavy-handed and big-government about the whole affair that makes me wonder if we shouldn’t be concerned. Maybe I’m out of the loop, but I wonder if there are not some civil liberties people that shouldn’t be investigating whether the authorities were not over the top in their way of handling this — particularly because it seems that the charges that initiated the whole affair were either baseless, untrue, or non-existent.
Posted by Bob Bixby at April 22, 2008 04:31 PM | eMail this entry! | 112 WordsThis entry was posted in the following categories: Politics and Culture
Bob,
I am still trying to figure out all of their rationale behind taking all of the children from the families. Is it only the allegations of abuse or is it also because of the danger of what they were being taught? If there is a precedent being set for the latter, that is definitely something about which to be concerned.
Posted by: Andrew Henderson at April 22, 2008 06:46 PMWe’ve been wondering the same thing. This is an easy group to pick on. They hold weird beliefs, they look and act strange, and they are just generally creepy. That however doesn’t mean that the state has a right to put kids in foster care. Having been involved with the foster care system in Minneapolis I find this even more shocking. Out there they don’t pull kids out until there is sexual abuse. Here, it was only an allegation and hundreds of kids were removed from not only their fathers, but also their mothers. This smells like a real grievous rights issue and I’m sure that the state of Texas is going to be paying out millions when it’s all said and done.
You can’t just violate civil rights when the group is unpopular and we don’t like what they doing anyway whether they are Muslims or FLDS eventually the group they don’t like will be us.
Posted by: Scott at April 22, 2008 08:46 PMI am certain that a precedent has been set that will be used to persecute Christian parents who are biblically training and sheltering their children.
I can’t defend the LDS group - I don’t know much about them, but I am pretty sure that due process (warrant, etc.) was not followed in this case.
Pretty scary.
Posted by: Coach C at April 23, 2008 12:04 AMHard to say. I have a missionary friend in Utah who is in favor of what was done. I haven’t read all his reasons why. Also, I don’t trust the media. I suspect we are not being told everything.
Up here in BC there is a big group of this sect also. (“Bountiful, BC” is the name of their town.) There is some infighting between some of the major players in the families up here, and the press up here paints some of these people rather sympathetically.
Also, in Canada, now that we have legalized same-sex marriage, it is hard to see how the state can argue against this.
The world is mad. Maranatha!
Regards,
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3
The whole thing is a mess.
And Judge Barbara? I would not want her calling the shots for my family.
I am praying.
Posted by: Todd Wood at April 23, 2008 04:18 AMI do have to say that I am a bit disturbed by the process and the hysteria that it has generated. While I do have a problem with putting the kids in foster care (seeing how rife with abuse that system is, at least in Vermont) I’m not sure what other option there is.
These parents have forced their minor children into polygomous marriages. So, if we leave the children with the parents, aren’t we guaranteed that pattern will be repeated? The parents have already shown a blatant disregard for the law as well as the welfare of their children. What’s going to make them change now? As soon as our ADD society forgets about this case, they’ll be back to the same predatory practices as before.
I do not trust the media in any situation. However, it’s also possible that the situation might be worse than what we are hearing.
Posted by: cbixby at April 23, 2008 07:33 AMHard to know what to think. The last thing in the world I want to do is to seem to defend this sort of wackiness.
That said, it’s interesting to compare what these people are doing with what happens with great regularity, say, in the inner city. Men have multiple wives (or girlfriends) and multiple children from them. Women, similarly, have multiple children from multiple men. There’s child abuse, drug abuse, neglect, etc. But since it’s not tied to a religion, little is done about it. At least that’s the way it seems.
Carry the comparison one step further: can you imagine the public outcry if hundreds of inner city children being taken by the state in this way?
Posted by: Chris Anderson at April 23, 2008 08:03 AMTo my understanding, no one has been charged with any crime. Also, the action was carried out based on an anonymous tip from a person that has since been discredited. This puts everything in the grey area for legality. Whether the accustions are false or true, this is a very sad situation.
Posted by: Chris at April 23, 2008 02:12 PM