May 17, 2006
I admit it
I teach nicer David ode
Posted by Bob Bixby at May 17, 2006 10:31 AM | eMail this entry! | 5 WordsThis entry was posted in the following categories:
HE BOOT ME BOY
Posted by: Gregory Linscott at May 17, 2006 10:44 AMWha????
(a little help for the uninitiated, please)
Posted by: Chris Anderson at May 17, 2006 11:34 AMHA! MUST TAKE FUSS THERE
P.S. Check out my article if you are interested.
The Problems of the DaVinci Code
Knarf
Posted by: Frank Sansone at May 17, 2006 12:15 PMOops, upon further review, please change FUSS to its old Frankish spelling of FOS.
HA! MUST TAKE FOS THERE
Knarf
Posted by: Frank Sansone at May 18, 2006 09:35 AMi twinge too
Posted by: jen d at May 19, 2006 08:18 AMI sting a tired toe.
Posted by: Michael Riley at May 19, 2006 10:45 AMOkay, I’ll bite too—
I’ve been waiting for a week for some kind of answer to Chris’query…
What on earth are you talking about?
Joe & Chris,
In case you have not gotten it, yet …
Think Anagrams.
Frank
Posted by: Frank Sansone at May 31, 2006 01:33 PMYeah, yeah, yeah. Greg told me.
Funny: for the last couple nights I’ve been reading “Journey to the Center of the Earth.” Don’t ask me why, because I don’t know. Anyway, it starts out with the same sort of thing.
Posted by: Chris Anderson at May 31, 2006 01:42 PMChris,
You would make a lousy cryptologist.
I actually meant to write a critique. May still. But I’ll link to Frank’s and direct people to Bauder’s book.
If I might take the liberty to brag on my own blog, my anagram is better than the ones in the comment section because as it appears it is meaningful. The David Ode I refer to is Psalm 2. It’s a conviction. Re-arrange the letters and you have a confession.
“I teach nicer Davd ode” rescrambled is “I read the Da Vinci Code.”
Posted by: Bob at May 31, 2006 01:50 PMChris, You would make a lousy cryptologist.
That may be the truest thing said on a flog in quite some time. Thanks for rubbing it in.
On the bright side, I do speak threeyearoldish.
Posted by: Chris Anderson at May 31, 2006 02:06 PMThanks for the explanation.
I will say, “Andy’s Anagram Solver” (!) at http://www.ssynth.co.uk/~gay/anagram.html was no help at all.
Posted by: Joe Hansen at May 31, 2006 11:10 PM