January 17, 2006

Every Tribe Entertainment’s Offense

Jason Janz was right to post his article, Nate Saint Played by Gay Activist in ‘End of the Spear.’ And the key word is “activist.”

I would like to offer up a simple biblical rationale that not only defends reports such as Janz’s, but settles in my mind the fact that Every Tribe Entertainment has sinned against the Body of Christ.

The objection is not that Chad Allen is a homosexual. It is that he is a homosexual activist. To my great shame I have lusted in my lifetime, but I have not campaigned to promote my sexual lust, to make it acceptable to the general public, and – worse – to reconcile my sexual lust with Christianity. That has never been my ambition. Instead, I have repented of it and abhorred it. Chad Allen, however, is on a mission. His mission is to promote homosexuality as normal, acceptable, and even compatible with the Christian message. I think that a theological and biblical case can be made to show that ETE has sinned. Jason Janz’s critique is not the frothing of a movie-hating fundamentalist that is clamoring for recognition as some have implied. Attention he has received, and well-deserved. But there is actually a biblical case to be made that Every Tribe Entertainment (henceforth ETE) has sinned against the Body of Christ by its choice of a homosexual activist.

First of all, let me offer some disclaimers:

1. I am not calling for a boycott.

2. I am not seeking to interfere with any person’s decision as to whether or not they will see this movie. My aim is simply to show that a very real offense against the Body of Christ has been committed. How you react is between you and the Lord.

Every Tribe Entertainment was not wrong to have selected a sinner for the role. Obviously. In fact, I will go so far as to say that the issue is not even that they selected a homosexual for the role. ETE offended the Body of Christ and Christ Himself in the selection of an activist for the role. Here’s why:

There are only two kinds of people in this world: the people of God and the enemies of God. Those of us who love Jesus Christ and have been rescued from sin were at one time enemies of God. Those who are not saved are still in active enmity against God. Now all of God’s enemies are enemies by default. They are the children of Adam. Many, however, are God’s enemies by design and defiance. There are degrees of adversarial intensity. Thus, the same Paul who said that “there are many adversaries” (1 Cor. 16:8) and that we wrestle “not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers (Ephesians 6:12), also felt compelled to name Alexander the Coppersmith because he had done “much harm” (2 Timothy 4:14). Alexander was a sin activist. His agenda was to oppose God’s messenger and God’s message. Chad Allen is no different.

One of the trademarks of true holiness is the capacity to recognize the defiant opponents of God, to mark them, and to deal with them accordingly. Thus, in response to the penetrating question in Psalm 15, “O, Lord, who shall dwell in Your holy hill?” one of the answers states, “[the person] in whose eyes a vile person is despised.” The notion that it is Christian charity to show all people, even evil people, the same magnanimity that we would show the less-evil person is simply deluded. Again, the Psalmist says that “the wicked prowl on every side when vileness is exalted among the sons of men” (Psalm 12:8). Why would a holy person want to exalt a sin activist? And is it not clearly an indication of the corruption of sin in the Church today that a Christian organization can make a movie of a Christian hero and knowingly select a sin activist? Again, the fact that the actor is a sinner is irrelevant. The fact that the sin is homosexuality is only partly relevant. It is the fact that the person is an activist for the promotion of sin that marks him as particularly evil.

For a Christian organization to use an activist only solidifies the activist’s sinful delusion that marks all wicked people: “He has said in his heart: You will not require an account” Psalm 10:13). Chad Allen is an enemy of God, not only by default, but by design. He, like many of the defiant enemies of God, has scorned God’s Law and is seeking to promote immorality as acceptable despite the clear teachings of God’s Holy Word. Chad Allen is so deluded that he proudly displays his confrontation with John MacArthur on his website. Clearly, he thinks that he looks good in that conversation. Why else would he have the transcript of his confrontation with a man of God on his personal website? He wants to make Romans 1:32 true of the people of God in that they, “knowing the righteous judgment of God that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” It is this defiant wickedness that seeks to change the rules established by God that marks the particularly ambitious enemies of God. “The wicked boasts of his heart’s desires” (Psalm 10:3). Is not activism a form of boasting? And is it not true that God is “angry with the wicked every day” (Psalm 7:11)? How can a professedly Christian organization with a professedly Christian mission knowingly assign any part of their mission to a defiant and evil person?

Chad Allen’s role is a blatant adversarial act against the holiness of God and ETE is complicit. There is no excuse for him because he is not a Christian. I marvel at the comments that are made appealing for great tolerance for the unbelieving Allen. The sin activist wants “approval” (Rom. 1:32) and he wants to win “approval” for his sin. Any approval will do. The promotion of a sin activist (in this case a homosexual activist) in a Christian movie with a supposedly Christian message dilutes the evangelical efforts to portray homosexuality as a reprehensible violation of God’s holy law. ETE has embraced a known and vocal enemy of holiness and stated that it is inconsequential to their mission. Consequently, their mission is unholy.

We all know homosexuals and lesbians. We may know individuals who privately struggle with these kinds of temptations. We have also been ashamed of the rabid anti-gay activism of certain supposedly Christian ministries that have embarrassed us by their antics. This is reprehensible and ought to be decried. But it should not take from us our will to recognize that the worst part of homosexual activism is the “activism.” For it is in the “activism” that we recognize one who is not merely a slave of sin, but a champion of sin.

Paul said,

But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its powers. And from such turn away (2 Timothy 3:1-5).

Why didn’t ETE turn away from Chad Allen? Especially since he’s an activist?

Posted by Bob Bixby at January 17, 2006 03:19 PM | TrackBack | eMail this entry! | 1247 Words
This entry was posted in the following categories:
Comments

i haven’t had time to scroll through the SI threads, so forgive me if i’m restating the obvious here. am i correct in understanding from several comments in your post here that the primary grievance / reason for the focus on chad allen particularly (as opposed to the lifestyles and agendas of the rest of the cast and crew, which seem to have received little to no attention, although it’s hard to believe they aren’t sinners, as well) is due to allen’s particularly outspoken activism and promotion of a gay lifestyle as normal and right?

has anyone written an open letter to chad allen? i’ve seen a lot of articles and buzz about articles, and i know some private letters have passed between individuals.

are you guys taping the LKL show tonight with mohler and allen?

Posted by: joy at January 17, 2006 03:32 PM

I just came across two good comments on the film and the issue of Allen’s activism. Challies.com (Hat tip: Joe Fleener) and Steve Camp. Steve Camp actually recommends not viewing the movie and calls for repentance from Steve Saint and ETE.

Posted by: Bob Bixby at January 17, 2006 04:27 PM

I agree with your assessment wholeheartedly. Those 5 missionaries were were a precious gift from Christ to his church. I can’t help but feel that we’ve dishonored giver by sullying the memory of the gift.

Posted by: Jay at January 18, 2006 08:35 AM

this was good and helpful to me. you didn’t make me wade through hip-deep arguments of mush, but plowed good and clear trails to truth. thanks for the effort that took.

Posted by: david at January 19, 2006 01:14 AM

I have posted this elsewhere but I will again here..

There is absolutely no credibility to a practicing, unrepentant (and proudly so per the cnn transcript) homosexual (or any other blatant and willful sinner) sharing the gospel. This is a perfect example of unequally yoking good(story) with evil(person). If an openly gay person is the front man for Christianity, God help the people whose souls will be lost by the hypocrisy of that message.

The openly gay star of this movie, states and I quote “It is a deep-founded, faith-based belief in God based upon the work that I’ve done growing up as a Catholic boy and then reaching out to Buddhism philosophy, to Hindu philosophy, to Native American beliefs and finally as I got through my course with addiction and alcoholism and finding a higher power that worked for me.”

The God of the Bible I read has no part of Buddhism, Hinduism or American Indian beliefs.

The star of the movie also says and again I quote “I’m a part of a wonderful community church here in Pasadena that has a very different interpretation of those same gospels that they are speaking of. There isn’t just one way to do this, there are a lot of paths”

The God of the Bible I read says “I am the truth and the light, no one comes to the Father but by me”. He also says “narrow is the path that leads to salvation” There is only one way and one path that leads to God. Unfortunately the star of this movie is on the path that leads to hell, not God and this is the person and the movie many churches are promoting on web pages and sermons as a good evangelistic tool.

This gay actor PROUDLY revels in his homosexuality and claims his “god” approves. Rebuke this garbage and do it loudly. The message of the gospel can be rendered ineffective if the messenger himself undermines the message. Hey, I know, how about a movie starring Michael Jackson as a person who runs a child care center and teaches the evils of child molestation!

How many people will be won to Christ by a person who says “do as I say, not as I do”?

Posted by: Carl at January 19, 2006 06:51 PM

Wowee Kazowee. That was awesome! I can’t imagine its being put any better.

Posted by: blestwithsons at January 19, 2006 09:25 PM

The fact that Chad Allen is a gay activist does not change the movie or its message. Chad Allen is free to attempt “bridge-building” between the homosexual community and Christians. No one can stop that. Every Tribe Entertainment and Steve Saint would never support that promotion and would never encourage it, but Chad is an independant agent. The inability to watch a movie with an objective eye for what is actually on the screen will always lead away from the point and the goal. I uderstand the sensitivity of those who want to keep the pristine and holy missionary endeavour of Nate Saint and his five companions preserved. The movie itslef must be the deciding factor that says if the legacy is preserved or not. Chad Allen does not play Chad Allen in the movie. He plays a man of whom the world was not worthy, a man of holiness, a man who would not cease to proclaim the saving gospel of Jesus Christ, and a man that was willing to be martyred in order that others might live. There must be a separation between the movie and the external politics relating to it. Yes, it would have been easier if an activist was not chosen to play the role. But the fact that one did does not automatically assume that Every Tribe and Steve Saint has sinned against the Body of Christ. That idea is simply ludicrous, unneccesary, and damaging. ETE made a movie and told a story. Casting directors chose the best available talent. The movie was excellently produced. How is the sin of Chad Allen’s activism thus transferred onto ETE? I completely understand the alarm of many concerned Christians, but casting out accusations of harming the Church is a serious matter. Christ views such sin against his Bride as privy to the greatest of torments. Please, be careful not to jump to conclusions. Let us look at the movie with objective eyes and soft hearts and be eager to tell others what on earth would cause five men to forsake all and die for a group of savage Indians.

With love,

GPA

Posted by: GPA at January 20, 2006 01:52 PM

Does anyone know the musical melody of the Madonna song “Like a Virgin”? Suppose I take that same melody and put Christian words to it. If I were to play you my “new” song, upon hearing the opening melody, are you going to be thinking about my new words of the old melody? How similar to Chad Allen giving a Christian message. Unless he repents of his sin, it is impossible to look past his current spiritual condition and that overshadows any message he might give in ANY “christian” movie he is in.

This gay actor PROUDLY revels in his homosexuality and claims his “god” approves of his lifestyle. Rebuke this garbage and do it loudly. The message of the gospel in this movie is lost completely by a messenger totally opposed to Scripture. Would you invite an unrepentant, convicted pedophile to lead a youth group at your church? How about inviting an unrepentant, convicted rapist to lead single women at a church bible study? Better still, how about an unrepentant, convicted embezzler to be the treasurer of your church? Why then an unrepentant, flaming homosexual as a messenger for Christ? How weak some people’s discernment has become.

Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction

Titus 1:9-16 says “9Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. 10For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 11Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake. 12One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. 13This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; 14Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. 15Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. 16They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

People need to open their eyes and obey God’s Word, including a lot of lukewarm so-called Christian leaders that are starting to look more and more like Scribes and Pharisees!

Wake up people

Posted by: Carl at January 20, 2006 02:27 PM

GPA,

At first blush your statement sounds cultured and worldly-wise, maybe even spiritually acute. It is actually none of the above.

You said

The fact that Chad Allen is a gay activist does not change the movie or its message.
and that therefore our condemnation of ETE’s choice is wrong.

Read Matthew 23. Jesus told the listening crowd to listen to what the Pharisees said, but to not do what they did. Then, He began to preach hell-fire and damnation to the hypocrites and vipers (as He called them) because of the utter incongruity of their lives with their message. The LORD of TRUTH commended their message, but condemned in the strongest terms both the messengers and the method. The messenger does matter. Especially if the message is as important as the defenders of ETE’s choice say it is.

If the MESSAGE of the film is as important as you say, then it is equally true that the MESSENGER matters. While there may be wonderful aspects of the message that will/must get through because the a true message is always valid (thus Jesus told the people to obey the Pharisees), it does not for one moment justify the deliberate selection of a person who makes everything he does a platform for a godless message.

Now, you may respond as many do, “but it’s just a movie.” However, you also said,

The movie itslef (sic) must be the deciding factor that says if the legacy is preserved or not.

That’s a pretty important message, don’t you think? IF the movie itself is the deciding factor that says if the legacy is preserved or not, why is it also a platform for a depraved agenda? Why does it say so little about Jesus Christ? Jesus Christ was the First Motive of these men. Yet you say,

ETE made a movie and told a story.
Yet, you apparently think that we will need to tell people “what one earth” would compel five men to give their lives. Seems to me if the story were told well that would be a critical part of it.

You offer up no Biblical rationale. If it is true that, as you say “Casting directors chose the best available talent,” how does that exculpate ETE? Where is your Biblical evidence that they are mandated to choose the best available actor, even if the best available actor is determined to use everything, even this movie, to promote his evil? The fact is you have no Biblical evidence for anything that you said in your post. I would hesitate before labeling as “ludicrous” the concerns of thousands in the Body of Christ when our concerns (especially mine as stated in my post) are biblically and theologically grounded.

You say, “I completely understand the alarm of many concerned Christians. . .”

Clearly, you don’t.

Posted by: Bob Bixby at January 20, 2006 03:02 PM

I didn’t read all these coments so forgive me if this has been said. Are we to hate Chad Allen because he has completely been decieved by the Evil one. How many of us have never been decieved by Satan?We should rejoice that he has a great chance to be exposed to Christianity. There has been a huge seed planted in his life. I prayerfully hope this experience will help Christ eventually reach him. It has also given us as Christians a_chance_to see that Allen needs prayer. One more thing we are told to hate the sin and not the sinner. What made me coment on this page at all was the mention of Chad Allen as evil. Noone is evil except satan and his demons. How would Allen see the love of Christ in that? Please pray for his salvation.

Posted by: Maria at January 21, 2006 09:53 AM

Maria,

The message of ths Gospel is Jesus and His salvation.

To understand that we need a savior, we first must learn what we have done wrong that REQUIRES that we need a savior. Chad seems to have been exposed to the Gospel but he does not admit to his sin. THERE IS NO SALVATION for a person who does not admit his sin. Even if he admits it, there is still one more thing. He must repent of it.

Chad is PROUD to be a sinner and PROUD to proclaim it. God’s word tells us to AVOID people like that. You are right, we are not to hate them. but we are to AVOID them.

Now how can a person like Chad be a messenger of the Gospel? Until he repents, he can’t. If you don’t like that answer, take it up with God because that is God’s standard.

Posted by: carl at January 21, 2006 01:30 PM

Maria,

One more rebuke of what you said. Where do you get that “noone is evil except satan”???

The BIBLE says in many places that people are evil. One verse that somes to mind is Jeremiah 13:10 whsih says “This evil people, which refuse to hear my words, which walk in the imagination of their heart, and walk after other gods, to serve them, and to worship them, shall even be as this girdle, which is good for nothing”

Sounds like Chad to me!


Posted by: Carl at January 21, 2006 04:09 PM

Thank you for having the courage to speak the truth in love ! (and back it with scripture) I spoke up about my feelings on the movie at endofthespear.com in the forums and I got blasted. I would like to share with you a comment that Jesse Saint (son of Steve Saint) said on the thread I posted called, What about Jesus?

” The purpose of this movie was NOT [emphasis mine] to preach the Gospel. It was to tell a true story of changed lives and to provoke people to ask the question, “What really caused the change.”

He also said

“One very big misconception of this story is that one of the reasons that the homicide rate in the tribe dropped by 90% following Rachel, Elizabeth and Dayumae going to Tiwaeno was because most of the tribe accepted Christ. Even now, probably under 10% of the Waodani are Christians. Many of the older Christians are from that Tiwaeno group, but even they did not all accept right away. The Waodani lived in constant fear and hatred. When the other family groups heard that the Gikitaidi had given up their vendettas, the other groups did as well. This was not the power of the gospel, in many cases, but a realization that there was another way to live without the hate and fear”

So if their intent was not about the Gospel and the change in the tribe was NOt by the power of the Gospel, why are so many well meaning Christians arguing in there defence that it was??

I think he unwittingly confirmed our fears about this movie, ETI, and its message. (or lack there of)

Posted by: TC at January 23, 2006 02:51 PM

I am sad. The story of Jim Elliot, Nate Saint and the others has been clouded by the choice to use an activist for and from the gay community in a lead role. The body of Christ has been put into a difficult position by this choice because now we are forced to decide whether to see the film and support the decision or not see it because of our struggle with the lifestyle that the lead actor promotes and lives. New Tribes has made a poor decision and should have known better. I am not in the place to tell anyone else what to do but I will not see the film and will let the church I pastor know of my decision. While I believe the Body of Christ should demonstrate the love of Jesus toward everyone including those who are gay, I also believe we must take a stand against that which is plainly condemned in the scripture. It is a difficult thing to do because so often individuals don’t believe we can love them while hating the sin that is destroying them. I will be praying for Chad Allen because he is loved by God and was died for by Jesus. But I cannot abide by the decision to use him in a place of ministry no matter his talent level. 2 Cor 6:14 “What fellowship can light have with darkness?”

Posted by: Brian Smith at February 2, 2006 11:18 PM

Pastor Bixby,

Excellent post, and I appreciate you not calling for a boycott, but causing your readers instead to think. I find it interesting that because we stand against sin, we are labeled as haters. Maria, as far as I know no one on the blog has advocated hating Chad Allen.

As blood bought children of God I believe we should remember 2 things, this is just a friendly reminder after reading all the comments.

1. As Jonathan Edwards resolved, let the sins of others produce deep mourning over the sin in our own lives. Let others faults remind us of our own bents, and let us take heed to stand lest we fall, instead of thinking all the while we are OK. Let us grieve for the sins of others like they were are own, and look towards our own hearts, lest in our fight to defend truth, we find ourselves growing cold and hard in our hearts. A man could go on fighting error till the day he dies, and all the while grow cold and dry towards God in his affections. Do not let your prayer lives deteroriate to a few minutes a day, cry out to God, stay for hours in the closet before you blast error and sin, then , when you are in the right frame, GO BLAST IT!

Having said that, once we make certain that we are right in these areas,

2. We must remember the God of the Bible is just and holy , and not only hates the sin but the Sinner.. ( I believe Carl pointed this out) Remember Romans 9, “Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated. Psalm 5:5 “You Hate all workers of iniquity”
Most people want to go to heaven, they just dont want God to be there when they get there. It is the sinner who wants to practice his sin , continue in it, but still be accepted by a Holy God, that God hates. When God refuses the vegetable sacrifice, the reaction is only anger. We cannot take the Love of God, without the Justice. So we are not given permission to hate people or our enemies, but love them, God retains the right.


Posted by: Nate at February 4, 2006 08:21 PM

I apolagize but I know personally that “End of the Spear” has had an impact on Chad Allen’s life. While shooting the film in Ecuador, he was only surrounded with Christians, who accepted him the way he was, but of course do not agree with what he does. He came back asking questions, but when he went back to his old lifestyle of friends, it became once again a challenge. God loves the sinner, but not the sin. He accepts us right where we are, but doesn’t want to leave us where we are. You see, even if this film where to have reached ONE person for the Lord, say Chad Allen himself, then it would all be worth it and alll of you would have a different attitude. You would all be saying “praise the Lord”. Well, you know it’s almost been a year since the movie released, and, I still hear about people complaining about, instead of praying about it…..Have you ever stopped, to look at your prayer life? How much time do you spend complaining about the circumstance you are facing? How much time do you spend taking it to God in prayer? This is what I believe we should do. Pray. After all, when two or three are gathered in his name, wont he be in the midst. Another note is when the cast was being choosen, there were backups for everyone….except Chad. If he got sick, or something where to of happen, we didn’t have someone to stand in. The reason i know all of this, is because for 3 months I was a temporary person for Every Tribe. I was one of the people who had to reply to all of the hate mail we received from all those who emailed, called, and sent letters. I have a question? What about the fox in Narnia? Has anyone condemed them? The voice of the fox is a gay. God loves us all. He has called us to love our neighbor. What ever we do to our neighbor in turn we are doing to God.

Posted by: C.J. at October 26, 2006 07:28 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Receive an email if someone
else comments on this post?

(by leaving this box checked you will also receive your own comment via email to confirm your subscription)